|
WAGNER |
Overture
Die Meistersinger |
|
BRAHMS |
Violin
Concerto
op.77 in D major |
|
MARTINU |
Symphony
No. 6 |
Günther Herbig
- conductor
Günther Herbig began
his musical training with Hermann Abendroth at the Franz Liszt Academy in
Weimar, Germany. He continued his studies with Hermann Scherchen and was one of
only a few students chosen for intensive study with Herbert von Karajan, with
whom he worked for two years. In 1972 he became General Music Director of the
Dresden Philharmonic Orchestra, and from 1977 until autumn 1983, held the same
position with the Berlin Symphony. In 1979 he was invited to become Principal
Guest Conductor of the BBC Philharmonic Orchestra. It was only in 1984, after he
had left East Germany, that Günther Herbig was able to conduct regularly in
Western Europe. Very quickly he was invited by the other major British
orchestras, including the London Symphony Orchestra, the Philharmonia and the
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. Since then he has conducted most of the major
European orchestras and has toured Japan, South America and Australia many
times.
Please
click here
for
Günther's full biography.
James Ehnes - violin
James Ehnes was born in 1976 in Brandon, Manitoba, Canada. He began violin
studies at the age of four, at age nine he became a protégé of the noted
Canadian violinist Francis Chaplin. He studied with Sally Thomas at the
Meadowmount School of Music, then in 1993 at The Juilliard School. He graduated
from Julliard in 1997, winning the Peter Mennin Prize for Outstanding
Achievement and Leadership in Music. James first gained national recognition in
1987 as winner of the Grand Prize in Strings at the Canadian Music Competition.
The following year he won the First Prize in Strings at the Canadian Music
Festival, the youngest musician ever to do so. At age 13, he made his orchestral
solo debut with the Orchestre symphonique de Montréal. He has won numerous
awards and prizes, including the first-ever Ivan Galamian Memorial Award, the
Canada Council for the Arts' prestigious Virginia Parker Prize, and a 2005 Avery
Fisher Career Grant. In October 2005, James was honoured by Brandon University
with a Doctor of Music degree (honoris causa) and in July 2007 he became the
youngest person ever elected as a Fellow to the Royal Society of Canada. In 2008
James won
the GRAMMY and JUNO Awards for his recording of concertos by Barber, Korngold
and Walton with the Vancouver Symphony Orchestra
Please
click here
for James's full biography.
|
Overture
Die Meistersinger |
R
Wagner (1813 - 1883)
|
‘Die
Meistersinger’ had first taken shape in Wagner’s mind in 1845 but it was in
March 1862 that Wagner composed the Overture, or Prelude as he later named it.
He had just moved to Biebrich near Mainz: ‘One evening from the balcony as I
watched a fine sunset light up the view of Mainz and the majestically flowing
Rhine, the Prelude to my Meistersinger suddenly sprang up clearly in my mind…
and I proceeded to draft the Prelude precisely as it appears today in the score,
that is setting forth very definitely the main motives of the whole drama’.
The ‘whole drama’ was to be completed some five
years later, but before that event the Prelude, or Overture, had been performed
in concerts a number of times.
The Overture opens with the ceremonial theme of
the Mastersingers themselves. Two other themes dominate the work, one of which,
the March of the Mastersingers, is an authentic march dating from 1697. Another
motive is incorporated into the victorious ‘Prize Song’ and yet another is
recognisable by the words in the English translation of the libretto: ‘Surely
she’ll refuse him’.
The combination of three themes (the Prize Song,
the Meistersinger’s theme and one of the march themes) builds up to a masterly
climax in which the whole orchestra takes part.
‘I listen to it as intently as I can i.e. as
often as I can stand it.’
Brahms in 1870 re. ‘Die Meistersingers’
|
Violin
Concerto
op.77 in D major |
Brahms (1833 -
1897)
|
The great violin
virtuoso Joseph Joachim had known Brahms for many years by the time the composer
decided to write a concerto for him. Being a pianist rather than a violinist,
Brahms asked the advice of his friend when it came to the technicalities of the
solo part. ‘Naturally I wanted you to correct it [the solo part]’, Brahms wrote
in a letter of August 1878, ‘but I shall be satisfied if you just write me a
word or two here and there in the music – words like ‘difficult’, ‘awkward’,
‘impossible’ etc.’.
Joachim took great
pains over the part and indicated many technical difficulties he felt would
hinder the performance and suggested changes that would be of benefit. Brahms
read all the advice and altered virtually nothing.
The concerto was
completed in the little Austrian resort of Pörtschach on the shores of the
Wörthersee where he had completed his Second Symphony the previous year. Joachim
gave the first performance in Leipzig on New Year’s Day in 1879 and it was he
who championed the work throughout Europe.
I Allegro non
troppo (quick and lively but not too much) – the first movement is lyrical
and relaxed as its long orchestral opening prepares for the solo violin which,
after opening with a flourish, settles into the prevailing mood of the
movement.
II Adagio
(slow, deliberate) – one celebrated violin virtuoso is said to have refused to
ever play ‘The Brahms’: ‘While the oboe plays the best tune, why should I
stand doing nothing?’ Indeed, one of the composer’s best melodies
opens the movement on the oboe (‘as the soloist stands doing nothing’!). After
this wind serenade, the solo violin joins in this ‘celebration of melody’,
decorating and embellishing it in the most delightful fashion.
III Allegro
gracioso, ma non troppo vivace (quick, lively and humorously, but not too
briskly) – Brahms was very particular that this finale wasn’t ravaged by
violinists determined to play it as fast as they dare!
There are elements of Hungarian folk music to this finale, probably in tribute
to Joachim’s native country. Apart from the opening theme that returns a number
of times there are two other main themes: a march and a lilting waltz. Brahms
keeps his main surprise for immediately after the striking cadenza, near the end
of the movement, with a new tempo and a new guise as the main theme becomes more
wild and dashing, propelling the music towards what promises to be a boisterous
ending. But Brahms again has something new – the music slows, relaxes and stops
‘rather like a good old fashioned steam train coming to rest at the buffers
at the end of a long haul’.
|
Symphony
No. 6 |
Bohuslav Martinu (1890 - 1959) |
Celebrating the 50th
anniversary of the death of Martinu
Martinu’s father was
the bell ringer and watchman in the Bohemian town of Polička. The family lived
up in the bell tower of the church of St. James and Bohuslav was born there on 8th
December, a local public holiday, so he was surrounded by the sound of bells
from the outset. He tended to be a sickly child and often had to be carried up
and down the 193 steps in the bell tower. This location influenced him in life
as he saw from this great height ‘space, which I always had in front of me’.
His talent for music
quickly became apparent and he gave his first violin recital in 1905. Soon after
this he started composing and nothing else really interested him. He went to the
Prague Conservatoire but preferred to spend his time reading and going to the
theatre. In 1909 he moved to the organ school but was expelled through lack of
effort. The 1920s saw him playing violin in the Czech Philharmonic and he moved
to Paris in 1923 where, in 1931, he was married. His wife worked hard to enable
Martinu to spend time composing.
He fled to New York
in 1941, having had to spend many months sleeping rough after leaving Paris in
1940 as the Nazis neared the French capital. His time in New York was difficult
– he didn’t speak English and he was an unknown musician/composer who had had to
leave all his scores behind in Europe. Life settled down somewhat and he taught
and composed in the USA for 12 years. In 1953 Charles Munch, conductor of the
Boston Symphony Orchestra, commissioned Martinu to write a piece celebrating the
75th anniversary of the orchestra. Tonight’s 6th Symphony
was the result. Earlier in his time in the USA he had had a near fatal fall,
which left him with a constant noise in his head; this affected his general
health causing him to leave the USA to retire to Nice. He eventually moved to
Switzerland where he died in 1959.
His output is
prolific: 16 operas; 15 ballets; 6 Symphonies; 7 string quartets; and many
choral works as well as a great number of compositions for all kinds of
ensembles.
‘Fantaisies
symphoniques’ (Symphony No. 6) has three movements and was composed in New York
and Paris. It was the first symphonic music he had written for a number of
years, the previous five having been composed in a burst of inspiration between
1942 and 1946.
I Lento–Allegro
– common to all three movements is the amazing orchestral sound that opens the
first movement. It has been described variously as ‘buzzing insects’, the sound
of winds like the ‘mistral’ and the noise ever present in Martinu’s head as a
result of his near fatal fall. This mysterious and eerie sound builds up to a
climax after which a cello introduces a new theme that propels the music into
the quicker part of the movement. Here various components appear, including a
grotesque march and a folk-like Czech hymn. Ideas from the ‘buzzing’ appear on
both solo and groups of instruments throughout and after all this agitation, the
final bars of the movement end in calm.
II Poco Allegro
– a variation of the ‘buzzing’ evolves into a lively scherzo, with sections of
more hymn-like ideas as a contrast. The music is often delicate though sometimes
noisy and gritty, but the ending of the movement decides to be delicate.
III Lento –
all of the elements present so far in the work are featured in the finale – the
swirl of the ‘buzzing’ music, the hymn-like phrases and melodies and some ‘sonic
grotesqueries’. There is one particularly colourful passage as solo woodwind,
horn and subdued strings remind us of the roots of Czech music in Smetana and
Dvořák. These are the ideas and effects to listen out for, as the music makes
its way to an ending of magical tranquillity – three gentle chords over held
horn notes, almost Brahmsian in its effect.
Yesterday, we
picked up a concert from Prague on the radio . . .my beloved Czech Philharmonic
conducted by Ančerl did the Fantaisie, which they call the Sixth Symphony. They
played it most beautifully. I must send them a card, they must know I listened’.
From a letter of November 7th 1956
© Barry Sharkey 2008 |